Although this blog has been silent lately, I’ve remained hard at work trying to develop a repeatable edge in markets generally, and in day-trading the $ES in particular. I am learning every day, and my results are improving but I am nowhere near where I need to be. Per Kathryn Schulz’s must-read book, I am taking the fact that I am still making so many mistakes as a sign of encouragement rather than a reason for disappointment or self-flagellation.
If I DO successfully learn to do a better job of scaling out properly, I tell myself, imagine how much better my results will be. I’ve also realized that I will get better entries on my trades on my counter-trend day trades (which I am doing a lot of), if I stop hesitating and truly accept the risk of loss (as Mark Douglas brilliantly advises). I am also trying to learn to focus on the extremes of given trading ranges and to stay out of the middle, as Futurestrader 71 teaches. Instead of looking for range extensions, I am more often betting on mean reversion. My success at doing this has contributed greatly to my improved results, but it is still not unusual for me to have days where I end up rationalizing an entry when I shouldn’t. Imagine how much better my trading will be if I can plug that leak.
As any regular reader would know, a lot of the free time I have is spent following baseball. Like trading, baseball is an endless grind with incredibly high short term variance. A pitcher cursing himself because the batter got a broken bat single will lead to the same detrimental effects as a trader summarily swearing off a certain set up because one trade got stopped out.
As I read stories of baseball player’s successes, I often find myself thinking of trading. When I look for lessons, I am particularly drawn to the late bloomers, the guys who made the same mistake every day for 3 years and then finally woke up one day and decided to stop making it. Jamie Moyer, Cliff Lee, Jayson Werth. (Yes, I am a Phillies fan.) There are many examples of baseball players with this career arc, but newly minted superstar Jose Bautista is undoubtedly one of baseball’s all time breakthrough performers.
An avid reader, and career underachiever, Bautista finally made the leap at the age of 29, not long after he read Malcolm Gladwell’s Outliers. In Jeff Passan’s fantastic article, How Jose Bautista experimented his way to greatness, Bautista explained why change was hard to come to:
Baseball is one of the sports where it’s hardest to make adjustments and trust in changes,” Bautista says. “Your results immediately are affected by making a change, and at least at the beginning, in the short term, it affects them negatively. Your production goes down when you make a change. It might help you in the long run, but it’s really tough to trust in yourself. You feel like your role gets affected, and maybe negatively. I knew I needed to make changes to become successful in the future. But if I did them and didn’t pick it up in one or two months, I might’ve been out of a job anyway. It’s hard for guys to do that, and I know because I went through it.”
There is a similar phenomenon at work in trading. One of the great benefits of markets is the instantaneous feedback they provide, but this feedback can make it harder to focus on the bigger picture, the long con. Over-trading your way to “even” today is not best for your development despite the false feeling of comfort it can provide. Similarly, for a batter, a bloop RBI single may feel better then a line out to the warning track, but which is truly a better result?
Amidst a lackluster career, Bautista finally stepped back and looked at the big picture. He tried everything and finally broke through to the other side. Joe Posnanski’s illuminating Sports Illustrated article dives deeply into the mechanics of Bautista’s change, as well as providing examples from other sports of late bloomers. I could quote from it ad nauseum, but it would be better for you to go read the whole thing.
Paul Konerko is yet another example of a player who made great improvements by adjusting his process. He was probably too good to begin with to be considered a consummate late bloomer, but at age 34, an age when players with similar skill sets often begin to decline. Konerko went from great to greater and is now a leading MVP candidate. He recently detailed the adjustments he made, which could just as easily be considered parting advice for traders. Enjoy.
“It’s always tempting to not want to do it the right way or not go about it the right way,” he said. “It’s really never-ending. It ends at the end of the season, but it really never ends until you are done playing. “You try to fight the fight the right way. I feel like I’ve been doing that not just last year, but maybe since halfway or so through the ’08 season. I feel like the results weren’t always there, but I was going about it right.
“That doesn’t always mean you get the results. It’s nice when the results come with it. But I think how you show up to play that day is important. That should be the reward, not the results of hitting a home run driving in a run.”











